{"draft":"draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-04","doc_id":"RFC9342","title":"Clustered Alternate-Marking Method","authors":["G. Fioccola, Ed.","M. Cociglio","A. Sapio","R. Sisto","T. Zhou"],"format":["HTML","TEXT","PDF","XML"],"page_count":"24","pub_status":"PROPOSED STANDARD","status":"PROPOSED STANDARD","source":"IP Performance Measurement","abstract":"This document generalizes and expands the Alternate-Marking\r\nmethodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can\r\nfollow several different paths in the network; this can result in a\r\nmultipoint-to-multipoint network. The network clustering approach is\r\npresented and, for this reason, the technique described here is\r\ncalled \"Clustered Alternate Marking\". This document obsoletes RFC\r\n8889.","pub_date":"December 2022","keywords":["Multipoint","Cluster","Performance","Measurement","Monitoring","Passive","Hybrid","Loss","Delay","Delay Variation","Hashing","Closed-Loop"],"obsoletes":["RFC8889"],"obsoleted_by":[],"updates":[],"updated_by":[],"see_also":[],"doi":"10.17487\/RFC9342","errata_url":null}