{"draft":"draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-03","doc_id":"RFC7358","title":"Label Advertisement Discipline for LDP Forwarding Equivalence Classes (FECs)","authors":["K. Raza","S. Boutros","L. Martini","N. Leymann"],"format":["ASCII","HTML"],"page_count":"8","pub_status":"PROPOSED STANDARD","status":"PROPOSED STANDARD","source":"Multiprotocol Label Switching","abstract":"The label advertising behavior of an LDP speaker for a given\r\nForwarding Equivalence Class (FEC) is governed by the FEC type\r\nand not necessarily by the LDP session's negotiated label\r\nadvertisement mode.  This document updates RFC 5036 to make that\r\nfact clear.  It also updates RFCs 3212, 4447, 5918, 6388, and\r\n7140 by specifying the label advertisement mode for all currently\r\ndefined LDP FEC types.","pub_date":"October 2014","keywords":[],"obsoletes":[],"obsoleted_by":[],"updates":["RFC3212","RFC4447","RFC5036","RFC5918","RFC6388","RFC7140"],"updated_by":[],"see_also":[],"doi":"10.17487\/RFC7358","errata_url":null}