| rfc9940v1.txt | rfc9940.txt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) N. Davis, Ed. | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) N. Davis, Ed. | |||
| Request for Comments: 9940 Ciena | Request for Comments: 9940 Ciena | |||
| Category: Informational A. Farrel, Ed. | Category: Informational A. Farrel, Ed. | |||
| ISSN: 2070-1721 Old Dog Consulting | ISSN: 2070-1721 Old Dog Consulting | |||
| T. Graf | T. Graf | |||
| Swisscom | Swisscom | |||
| Q. Wu | Q. Wu | |||
| Huawei | ||||
| C. Yu | C. Yu | |||
| Huawei Technologies | Huawei | |||
| February 2026 | February 2026 | |||
| Some Key Terms for Network Fault and Problem Management | Some Key Terms for Network Fault and Problem Management | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| This document sets out some terms that are fundamental to a common | This document sets out some terms that are fundamental to a common | |||
| understanding of network fault and problem management within the | understanding of network fault and problem management within the | |||
| IETF. | IETF. | |||
| skipping to change at line 85 ¶ | skipping to change at line 84 ¶ | |||
| Successful operation of large networks depends on effective network | Successful operation of large networks depends on effective network | |||
| management. This requires a virtuous circle of network control, | management. This requires a virtuous circle of network control, | |||
| network observability, network analytics, network assurance, and back | network observability, network analytics, network assurance, and back | |||
| to network control. Network fault and problem management [RFC6632] | to network control. Network fault and problem management [RFC6632] | |||
| is an important aspect of network management and control solutions. | is an important aspect of network management and control solutions. | |||
| It deals with the detection, reporting, inspection, isolation, | It deals with the detection, reporting, inspection, isolation, | |||
| correlation, and management of events within the network. The | correlation, and management of events within the network. The | |||
| intention of this document is to focus on those events that have a | intention of this document is to focus on those events that have a | |||
| negative effect on the network's ability to forward traffic according | negative effect on the network's ability to forward traffic according | |||
| to expected behavior and so deliver services, the ability to control | to expected behaviors that may reduce the network's ability to | |||
| and operate the network, and other faults that reduce the quality or | deliver services. Such events may also impact the ability to control | |||
| reliability of the delivered service. The concept of fault and | and operate the network. The document also considers other faults | |||
| problem management extends to include actions taken to determine the | that reduce the quality or reliability of the delivered service. The | |||
| causes of problems and to work toward recovery of expected network | concept of fault and problem management extends to include actions | |||
| behavior. | taken to determine the causes of problems and to work toward recovery | |||
| of expected network behavior. | ||||
| A number of work efforts within the IETF seek to provide components | A number of work efforts within the IETF seek to provide components | |||
| of a fault management system, such as YANG data models or management | of a fault management system, such as YANG data models or management | |||
| protocols. It is important that a common terminology be used so that | protocols. It is important that a common terminology be used so that | |||
| there is a clear understanding of how the elements of the management | there is a clear understanding of how the elements of the management | |||
| and control solutions fit together and how faults and problems will | and control solutions fit together and how faults and problems will | |||
| be handled. | be handled. | |||
| This document sets out some terms that are fundamental to a common | This document sets out some terms that are fundamental to a common | |||
| understanding of network fault and problem management. While | understanding of network fault and problem management. While | |||
| skipping to change at line 178 ¶ | skipping to change at line 178 ¶ | |||
| process of collecting operational network data categorized | process of collecting operational network data categorized | |||
| according to the network plane (e.g., Layer 3, Layer 2, and Layer | according to the network plane (e.g., Layer 3, Layer 2, and Layer | |||
| 1) from which it was derived. Data collected through the Network | 1) from which it was derived. Data collected through the Network | |||
| Telemetry process does not contain any data related to service | Telemetry process does not contain any data related to service | |||
| definitions (i.e., "intent" per Section 3.1 of [RFC9315]). | definitions (i.e., "intent" per Section 3.1 of [RFC9315]). | |||
| Network Monitoring: This is the process of keeping a continuous | Network Monitoring: This is the process of keeping a continuous | |||
| record of functions related to a network topology. It involves | record of functions related to a network topology. It involves | |||
| tracking various aspects such as traffic patterns, device health, | tracking various aspects such as traffic patterns, device health, | |||
| performance metrics, and overall network behavior. This approach | performance metrics, and overall network behavior. This approach | |||
| differentiates network monitoring from resource or device | differentiates Network Monitoring from resource or device | |||
| monitoring, which focuses on individual resources or components | monitoring, which focuses on individual resources or components | |||
| (Section 3.2). | (Section 3.2). | |||
| Network Analytics: This is the process of deriving analytical | Network Analytics: This is the process of deriving analytical | |||
| insights from operational network data. A process could be | insights from operational network data. A process could be | |||
| executed by a piece of software, a system, or a human that | executed by a piece of software, a system, or a human that | |||
| analyzes operational data and outputs new analytical data related | analyzes operational data and outputs new analytical data related | |||
| to the operational data -- for example, a symptom. | to the operational data -- for example, a symptom. | |||
| Network Observability: This is the process of enabling network | Network Observability: This is the process of enabling network | |||
| behavioral assessment through analysis of observed operational | behavioral assessment through analysis of observed operational | |||
| network data (logs, alarms, traces, etc.) with the aim of | network data (logs, alarms, traces, etc.) with the aim of | |||
| detecting symptoms of network behavior, and to identify anomalies | detecting symptoms of network behavior, and identifying anomalies | |||
| and their causes. Network Observability begins with information | and their causes. Network Observability begins with information | |||
| gathered using Network Monitoring tools and that may be further | gathered using Network Monitoring tools. That information may be | |||
| enriched with other operational data. The expected outcome of the | further enriched with other operational data. The expected | |||
| observability processes is identification and analysis of | outcome of the observability processes is identification and | |||
| deviations in observed state versus the expected state of a | analysis of deviations in observed state versus the expected state | |||
| network. | of a network. | |||
| Thus, there is a cascaded sequence where the following relationships | Thus, there is a cascaded sequence where the following relationships | |||
| apply: | apply: | |||
| * Network Telemetry is the process of collecting operational data | * Network Telemetry is the process of collecting operational data | |||
| from a network. | from a network. | |||
| * Network Monitoring is the process of creating/keeping a record of | * Network Monitoring is the process of creating/keeping a record of | |||
| data gathered in Network Telemetry. | data gathered in Network Telemetry. | |||
| skipping to change at line 221 ¶ | skipping to change at line 221 ¶ | |||
| * Network Observability is the process of enabling behavioral | * Network Observability is the process of enabling behavioral | |||
| assessment of a network through Network Analytics. | assessment of a network through Network Analytics. | |||
| 3.2. Core Terms | 3.2. Core Terms | |||
| The terms in this section are presented in an order that is intended | The terms in this section are presented in an order that is intended | |||
| to flow such that it is possible to gain understanding reading top to | to flow such that it is possible to gain understanding reading top to | |||
| bottom. The figures and explanations in Section 4 may aid | bottom. The figures and explanations in Section 4 may aid | |||
| understanding the terms set out here. | understanding the terms set out here. | |||
| Resource: An element of a network system. | Resource: A Resource is an element of a network system. | |||
| * Resource is a recursive concept so that a Resource may be a | * Resource is a recursive concept so that a Resource may be a | |||
| collection of other Resources (for example, a network node | collection of other Resources (for example, a network node | |||
| comprises a collection of network interfaces). | comprises a collection of network interfaces). | |||
| Characteristic: Observable or measurable aspect or behavior | Characteristic: A Characteristic is an observable or measurable | |||
| associated with a Resource. | aspect or behavior associated with a Resource. | |||
| * A Characteristic may be considered to be built on facts (see | * A Characteristic may be considered to be built on facts (see | |||
| 'Value', below) and the contexts and descriptors that identify | "Value", below) and the contexts and descriptors that identify | |||
| and give meaning to the facts. | and give meaning to the facts. | |||
| * The term "Metric" [RFC9417] is another word for a measurable | * The term "Metric" (see "metric" in [RFC9417]) is another word | |||
| Characteristic which may also be thought of as analogous to a | for a measurable Characteristic, which may also be thought of | |||
| 'variable'. | as analogous to a "variable". | |||
| Value: A measure of a Characteristic associated with a Resource. It | Value: A Value is a measure of a Characteristic associated with a | |||
| may be in the form of a categorization (e.g., high or low), an | Resource. It may be in the form of a categorization (e.g., high | |||
| integer (e.g., a count or gauge), or a reading of a continuous | or low), an integer (e.g., a count or gauge), or a reading of a | |||
| variable (e.g., an analog measurement), etc. | continuous variable (e.g., an analog measurement), etc. | |||
| Change: In the context of Network Monitoring, the variation in the | Change: In the context of Network Monitoring, a Change is the | |||
| Value of a Characteristic associated with a Resource. A Change | variation in the Value of a Characteristic associated with a | |||
| may arise over a period of time. | Resource. A Change may arise over a period of time. | |||
| * Not all Changes are noteworthy (i.e., they do not have | * Not all Changes are noteworthy (i.e., they do not have | |||
| Relevance). | Relevance). | |||
| * Perception of Change depends upon Detection, the sampling | * Perception of Change depends upon Detection, the sampling | |||
| rate/accuracy/detail, and perspective. | rate/accuracy/detail, and perspective. | |||
| * It may be helpful to qualify this as "Value Change" because the | * It may be helpful to qualify this as "Value Change" because the | |||
| English word "change" is often heavily used. | English word "change" is often heavily used. | |||
| Event: The variation in Value of a Characteristic of a Resource at a | Event: An Event is the variation in Value of a Characteristic of a | |||
| distinct moment in time (i.e., the period is negligible). | Resource at a distinct moment in time (i.e., the period is | |||
| negligible). | ||||
| * Compared with a Change, which may be over a period of time, an | * Compared with a Change, which may be over a period of time, an | |||
| Event happens at a distinct moment in time. Thus, an Event may | Event happens at a distinct moment in time. Thus, an Event may | |||
| be the observation of a Change. | be the observation of a Change. | |||
| Condition: An interpretation of the Values of a set of one or more | Condition: A Condition is an interpretation of the Values of a set | |||
| Characteristics of a Resource (with respect to working order or | of one or more Characteristics of a Resource (with respect to | |||
| some other aspect relevant to the Resource purpose/application) -- | working order or some other aspect relevant to the Resource | |||
| for example, "low available memory". Thus, it is the output of a | purpose/application) -- for example, "low available memory". | |||
| function applied to a set of one or more variables. | Thus, it is the output of a function applied to a set of one or | |||
| more variables. | ||||
| State: A particular Condition that a Resource has (i.e., it is in a | State: A State is a particular Condition that a Resource has (i.e., | |||
| State) at a specific time. For example, a router may report the | it is in a State) at a specific time. For example, a router may | |||
| total amount of memory it has and how much is free. These are the | report the total amount of memory it has and how much is free. | |||
| Values of two Characteristics of a Resource. These Values can be | These are the Values of two Characteristics of a Resource. These | |||
| interpreted to determine the Condition of the Resource, and that | Values can be interpreted to determine the Condition of the | |||
| may determine the State of the router, such as shortage of memory. | Resource, and that may determine the State of the router, such as | |||
| shortage of memory. | ||||
| * While a State may be observed at a specific moment in time, it | * While a State may be observed at a specific moment in time, it | |||
| is actually determined by summarizing measurement over time in | is actually determined by summarizing measurement over time in | |||
| a process sometimes called State compression. | a process sometimes called State compression. | |||
| * It may be helpful to qualify this as "Resource State" to make | * It may be helpful to qualify this as "Resource State" to make | |||
| clear the distinction between this and other uses of "state" | clear the distinction between this and other uses of "state" | |||
| such as "protocol state". | such as "protocol state". | |||
| * This term may be contrasted with "Operational State" as used in | * This term may be contrasted with "operational state" as used in | |||
| [RFC8342]. For example, the state of a link might be up/down/ | [RFC8342]. For example, the state of a link might be up/down/ | |||
| degraded, but the operational state of the link would include a | degraded, but the operational state of the link would include a | |||
| collection of Values of Characteristics of the link. | collection of Values of Characteristics of the link. | |||
| Detect (hence Detected, Detection): To notice the presence of | Detect (hence Detected, Detection): To Detect is to notice the | |||
| something (State, Change, Event, activity, etc.) and hence also to | presence of something (State, Change, Event, activity, etc.) | |||
| notice a Change (from the perspective of an observer such as a | ||||
| monitoring system). | ||||
| Relevance: Consideration of an Event, State, or Value (through the | * Also to notice a Change (from the perspective of an observer | |||
| application of policy, relative to a specific perspective, intent, | such as a monitoring system). | |||
| and in relation to other Events, States, and Values) to determine | ||||
| whether it is of note to the system that controls or manages the | Relevance: Relevance is the consideration of an Event, State, or | |||
| network. Note, for example, that not all Changes are Relevant. | Value (through the application of policy, relative to a specific | |||
| perspective or intent, and in relation to other Events, States, | ||||
| and Values) to determine whether it is of note to the system that | ||||
| controls or manages the network. Note, for example, that not all | ||||
| Changes are Relevant. | ||||
| * This term may also be used as "Relevant Event", "Relevant | * This term may also be used as "Relevant Event", "Relevant | |||
| State", or "Relevant Value". | State", or "Relevant Value". | |||
| Occurrence: A Relevant Event or a particular Relevant Change. | Occurrence: An Occurrence is a Relevant Event or a particular | |||
| Relevant Change. | ||||
| * An Occurrence may be an aggregation or abstraction of multiple | * An Occurrence may be an aggregation or abstraction of multiple | |||
| fine-grained Events or Changes. | fine-grained Events or Changes. | |||
| * An Occurrence may occur at any macro or micro scale because | * An Occurrence may occur at any macro or micro scale because | |||
| Resources are a recursive concept, and may be perceived, | Resources are a recursive concept. An Occurrence may be | |||
| depending on the scope of observation (i.e., according to the | perceived, depending on the scope of observation (i.e., | |||
| level of Resource recursion that is examined). That is, | according to the level of Resource recursion that is examined). | |||
| Occurrences, themselves, are a recursive concept. | That is, Occurrences, themselves, are a recursive concept. | |||
| Fault: An Occurrence (i.e., an Event or a Change) that is not | Fault: A Fault is an Occurrence (i.e., an Event or a Change) that is | |||
| desired/required (as it may be indicative of a current or future | not desired/required (as it may be indicative of a current or | |||
| undesired State). Thus, a Fault happens at a moment in time. A | future undesired State). Thus, a Fault happens at a moment in | |||
| Fault can potentially be associated with a Cause. See [RFC8632] | time. A Fault can potentially be associated with a Cause. See | |||
| for a more detailed discussion of network faults. | [RFC8632] for a more detailed discussion of network faults. | |||
| * Note that there is a distinction between a Fault and a Problem | * Note that there is a distinction between a Fault and a Problem | |||
| that depends on context. For example, in a connectivity | that depends on context. For example, in a connectivity | |||
| service where redundancy is present, a link down is a Problem, | service where redundancy is present, a link down is a Problem, | |||
| but from the perspective of managing the network resources, a | but from the perspective of managing the network resources, a | |||
| link down is a Fault. Likewise, for example, in a router with | link down is a Fault. Likewise, for example, in a router with | |||
| two power supplies, if the backup power supply fails leaving | two power supplies, if the backup power supply fails leaving | |||
| the primary unprotected, this is a Problem. | the primary unprotected, this is a Problem. | |||
| Problem: A State that is undesirable and that may require remedial | Problem: A Problem is a State that is undesirable and that may | |||
| action. A Problem cannot necessarily be associated with a Cause. | require remedial action. A Problem cannot necessarily be | |||
| The resolution of a Problem does not necessarily act on the thing | associated with a Cause. The resolution of a Problem does not | |||
| that has the Problem. | necessarily act on the thing that has the Problem. | |||
| * Note that there is a historic aspect to the concept of a | * Note that there is a historic aspect to the concept of a | |||
| Problem. The current State may be operational, but there could | Problem. The current State may be operational, but there could | |||
| have been a Fault that is unexplained, and the fact of that | have been a Fault that is unexplained, and the fact of that | |||
| unexplained recent Fault is a Problem. | unexplained recent Fault is a Problem. | |||
| * Note that while a Problem is unresolved it may continue to | * Note that while a Problem is unresolved it may continue to | |||
| require attention. A record of resolved Problems may be | require attention. A record of resolved Problems may be | |||
| maintained in a log. | maintained in a log. | |||
| skipping to change at line 357 ¶ | skipping to change at line 363 ¶ | |||
| operational once more) but may leave the Problem as unresolved | operational once more) but may leave the Problem as unresolved | |||
| (because the loss of light has not been explained). Further, | (because the loss of light has not been explained). Further, | |||
| in this example, there could be another development (the reason | in this example, there could be another development (the reason | |||
| for the temporary loss of light is traced to a microbend in the | for the temporary loss of light is traced to a microbend in the | |||
| fiber that is repaired) resulting in that unresolved Problem | fiber that is repaired) resulting in that unresolved Problem | |||
| now being resolved. But, in this example, this still leaves a | now being resolved. But, in this example, this still leaves a | |||
| further Problem unresolved (a microbend occurred, and that | further Problem unresolved (a microbend occurred, and that | |||
| Problem is not resolved until it is understood how it occurred | Problem is not resolved until it is understood how it occurred | |||
| and a remedy is put in place to prevent recurrence). | and a remedy is put in place to prevent recurrence). | |||
| Cause: The Events (Detected or otherwise) that gave rise to a Fault/ | Cause: A Cause is the Events (Detected or otherwise) that gave rise | |||
| Problem. | to a Fault/Problem. | |||
| Incident: Also referred to as "Network Incident". An Incident is an | Incident: Also referred to as "Network Incident". An Incident is an | |||
| undesired Occurrence such as an unexpected interruption of a | undesired Occurrence such as an unexpected interruption of a | |||
| network service, degradation of the quality of a network service, | network service, degradation of the quality of a network service, | |||
| or the below-target performance of a network service. An Incident | or the below-target performance of a network service. An Incident | |||
| results from one or more Problems, and a Problem may give rise to | results from one or more Problems, and a Problem may give rise to | |||
| or contribute to one or more Incidents. Greater discussion of | or contribute to one or more Incidents. Greater discussion of | |||
| Network Incident relationships, including Customer Incidents and | Network Incident relationships, including Customer Incidents and | |||
| Incident management, can be found in [Net-Incident-Mgmt-YANG]. | Incident management, can be found in [Net-Incident-Mgmt-YANG]. | |||
| Symptom: An observable Value, Change, State, Event, or Condition | Symptom: A Symptom is an observable Value, Change, State, Event, or | |||
| considered as an indication of a Problem or potential Problem. | Condition considered as an indication of a Problem or potential | |||
| Problem. | ||||
| Anomaly: Also referred to as "Network Anomaly". An Anomaly is an | Anomaly: Also referred to as "Network Anomaly". An Anomaly is an | |||
| unusual or unexpected Event or pattern in network data in the | unusual or unexpected Event or pattern in network data in the | |||
| forwarding plane, control plane, or management plane that deviates | forwarding plane, control plane, or management plane that deviates | |||
| from the normal, expected behavior. See [Net-Anomaly-Arch] for | from the normal, expected behavior. See [Net-Anomaly-Arch] for | |||
| more details. | more details. | |||
| Alert: An indication of a Fault. | Alert: An Alert is an indication of a Fault. | |||
| Alarm: As specified in [RFC8632], signifies an undesirable State in | Alarm: As specified in [RFC8632], an Alarm signifies an undesirable | |||
| a Resource that requires corrective action. From a management | State in a Resource that requires corrective action. From a | |||
| point of view, an Alarm can be seen as a State in its own right | management point of view, an Alarm can be seen as a State in its | |||
| and the transition to this State may result in an Alert being | own right and the transition to this State may result in an Alert | |||
| issued. The receipt of this Alert may give rise to a continuous | being issued. The receipt of this Alert may give rise to a | |||
| indication (to a human operator) highlighting the potential or | continuous indication (to a human operator) highlighting the | |||
| actual presence of a Problem. | potential or actual presence of a Problem. | |||
| 3.3. Other Terms | 3.3. Other Terms | |||
| Three other terms may be helpful: | Three other terms may be helpful: | |||
| Intermittent: A State that is not continuous but that keeps | Intermittent: A State that is not continuous but that keeps | |||
| recurring in some time frame. | recurring in some time frame. | |||
| Transient: A State that is not continuous and that occurs once in | Transient: A State that is not continuous and that occurs once in | |||
| some time frame. | some time frame. | |||
| skipping to change at line 461 ¶ | skipping to change at line 468 ¶ | |||
| Change at a time Change over time Change over time | Change at a time Change over time Change over time | |||
| Figure 2: Characteristics and Changes | Figure 2: Characteristics and Changes | |||
| Figure 3 shows the workflow progress for Events. As noted above, an | Figure 3 shows the workflow progress for Events. As noted above, an | |||
| Event is a Change in the Value of a Characteristic at a time. The | Event is a Change in the Value of a Characteristic at a time. The | |||
| Event may be evaluated (considering policy, relative to a specific | Event may be evaluated (considering policy, relative to a specific | |||
| perspective, with a view to intent, and in relation to other Events, | perspective, with a view to intent, and in relation to other Events, | |||
| States, and Values) to determine if it is an Occurrence and possibly | States, and Values) to determine if it is an Occurrence and possibly | |||
| to indicate a Change of State. An Occurrence may be undesirable (a | to indicate a Change of State. An Occurrence may be undesirable (a | |||
| Fault) and that can cause an Alert to be generated, may be evidence | Fault), which might cause an Alert to be generated. Or, an | |||
| of a Problem and could directly indicate a Cause. In some cases, an | Occurrence may be evidence of a Problem and could directly indicate a | |||
| Alert may give rise to an Alarm highlighting the potential or actual | Cause. In some cases, an Alert may give rise to an Alarm | |||
| presence of a Problem. | highlighting the potential or actual presence of a Problem. | |||
| Alert - - - > Alarm | Alert - - - > Alarm | |||
| ^ | ^ | |||
| | | | | |||
| | -----> Cause | | -----> Cause | |||
| | | | | | | |||
| |----------> Problem | |----------> Problem | |||
| | | | | |||
| | | | | |||
| Fault | Fault | |||
| skipping to change at line 500 ¶ | skipping to change at line 507 ¶ | |||
| progress for States. As shown in Figure 2, Change noted at a | progress for States. As shown in Figure 2, Change noted at a | |||
| particular time gives rise to State. The State may be deemed to have | particular time gives rise to State. The State may be deemed to have | |||
| Relevance considering policy, relative to a specific perspective, | Relevance considering policy, relative to a specific perspective, | |||
| with a view to intent, and in relation to other Events, States, and | with a view to intent, and in relation to other Events, States, and | |||
| Values. A Relevant State may be deemed a Problem, or it may indicate | Values. A Relevant State may be deemed a Problem, or it may indicate | |||
| a Problem or potential Problem. | a Problem or potential Problem. | |||
| Problems may be considered based on Symptoms and may map directly or | Problems may be considered based on Symptoms and may map directly or | |||
| indirectly to Causes. An Incident results from one or more Problems. | indirectly to Causes. An Incident results from one or more Problems. | |||
| An Alarm may be raised as the result of a Problem, and the transition | An Alarm may be raised as the result of a Problem, and the transition | |||
| to an Alarmed state may give rise to an Alert. | to an alarmed State may give rise to an Alert. | |||
| Alarm - - -> Alert | Alarm - - -> Alert | |||
| ^ | ^ | |||
| | ------> Incident | | ------> Incident | |||
| | | | | | | |||
| | | ---> Cause | | | ---> Cause | |||
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Problem---------> Symptom | Problem---------> Symptom | |||
| ^ | ^ | |||
| | | | | |||
| skipping to change at line 560 ¶ | skipping to change at line 567 ¶ | |||
| Events and States (and the Alerts that they might give rise to) must | Events and States (and the Alerts that they might give rise to) must | |||
| be treated with caution to dampen any "flapping" (so that consistent | be treated with caution to dampen any "flapping" (so that consistent | |||
| States may be observed) and to avoid overwhelming management | States may be observed) and to avoid overwhelming management | |||
| processes or systems. Analog Values may be read or notified from the | processes or systems. Analog Values may be read or notified from the | |||
| Resource and could transition a threshold, be deemed Relevant Values, | Resource and could transition a threshold, be deemed Relevant Values, | |||
| or be evaluated over time. Events may be counted, and the Count may | or be evaluated over time. Events may be counted, and the Count may | |||
| cross a threshold or reach a Relevant Value. | cross a threshold or reach a Relevant Value. | |||
| The Threshold Process may be implementation specific and subject to | The Threshold Process may be implementation specific and subject to | |||
| policies. When a threshold is crossed and any other conditions are | policies. When a threshold is crossed and any other conditions are | |||
| matched, an Event may be determined and may be treated like any other | matched, an Event may be determined and treated like any other Event. | |||
| Event. | ||||
| Occurrence | Occurrence | |||
| ^ | ^ | |||
| | | | | |||
| |---------------------> State | |---------------------> State | |||
| | | | | |||
| | ------- Relevance | | ------- Relevance | |||
| |------>| Count |-----------------------------> Value | |------>| Count |-----------------------------> Value | |||
| | ------- | ^ | | ------- | ^ | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |||
| skipping to change at line 689 ¶ | skipping to change at line 695 ¶ | |||
| [RFC9417] Claise, B., Quilbeuf, J., Lopez, D., Voyer, D., and T. | [RFC9417] Claise, B., Quilbeuf, J., Lopez, D., Voyer, D., and T. | |||
| Arumugam, "Service Assurance for Intent-Based Networking | Arumugam, "Service Assurance for Intent-Based Networking | |||
| Architecture", RFC 9417, DOI 10.17487/RFC9417, July 2023, | Architecture", RFC 9417, DOI 10.17487/RFC9417, July 2023, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9417>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9417>. | |||
| Acknowledgments | Acknowledgments | |||
| The authors would like to thank Med Boucadair, Wanting Du, Joe | The authors would like to thank Med Boucadair, Wanting Du, Joe | |||
| Clarke, Javier Antich, Benoit Claise, Christopher Janz, Sherif | Clarke, Javier Antich, Benoit Claise, Christopher Janz, Sherif | |||
| Mostafa, Kristian Larsson, Dirk Hugo, Carsten Bormann, Hilarie Orman, | Mostafa, Kristian Larsson, Dirk Von Hugo, Carsten Bormann, Hilarie | |||
| Stewart Bryant, Bo Wu, Paul Kyzivat, Jouni Korhonen, Reshad Rahman, | Orman, Stewart Bryant, Bo Wu, Paul Kyzivat, Jouni Korhonen, Reshad | |||
| Rob Wilton, Mahesh Jethanandani, Tim Bray, Paul Aitken, and Deb | Rahman, Rob Wilton, Mahesh Jethanandani, Tim Bray, Paul Aitken, and | |||
| Cooley for their helpful comments. | Deb Cooley for their helpful comments. | |||
| Special thanks to the team that met at a side meeting at IETF 120 to | Special thanks to the team that met at a side meeting at IETF 120 to | |||
| discuss some of the thorny issues: | discuss some of the thorny issues: | |||
| * Benoit Claise | * Benoit Claise | |||
| * Watson Ladd | * Watson Ladd | |||
| * Brad Peters | * Brad Peters | |||
| * Bo Wu | * Bo Wu | |||
| * Georgios Karagiannis | * Georgios Karagiannis | |||
| * Olga Havel | * Olga Havel | |||
| skipping to change at line 740 ¶ | skipping to change at line 746 ¶ | |||
| Qin Wu | Qin Wu | |||
| Huawei | Huawei | |||
| 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District | 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District | |||
| Nanjing | Nanjing | |||
| Jiangsu, 210012 | Jiangsu, 210012 | |||
| China | China | |||
| Email: bill.wu@huawei.com | Email: bill.wu@huawei.com | |||
| Chaode Yu | Chaode Yu | |||
| Huawei Technologies | Huawei | |||
| Email: yuchaode@huawei.com | Email: yuchaode@huawei.com | |||
| End of changes. 31 change blocks. | ||||
| 90 lines changed or deleted | 96 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. | ||||